Skip to content
Supreme Poker World

The Lowest-Rated Games of This Year, Based on Review Aggregator Metacritic

Everywhere you look, enthusiasts are foaming at the mouth to post their lists of the best games of 2025. However, what of the stinkers, the failures? Let's take a momentary detour to honor the absolute worst games of the year, as determined by review aggregator Metacritic. Is every one of these games as disappointing as the reviews suggest? We shall see.

10. Welcome Tour for Switch 2

Aggregate Score: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this showcase title were colored by its $9.99 price tag, with many voicing frustration it wasn't a complimentary title like competing console launches. Critical opinion varied dramatically, from "crushing disappointment" to slightly kinder takes that noted the delightful software underneath the controversy. Despite the debate, the title proved to be a notable seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10

Presented as "beyond a racing game," this simulation from European developers received overwhelmingly poor reviews. The consensus was that the game felt unfinished in key areas, notably in a year filled with stellar racing titles. Ultimately, this underwhelming entry was best left unplayed.

8. Bubsy's Purrfect Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10

To begin with: the confusing punctuation is a notable point of contention. This anthology of retro Bubsy titles showcases a sarcastic feline known for constant hacky one-liners. Reviewers noted that these games were not good in their time and feel dated with age. The surprisingly strong user score is a baffling oddity to the Metascore.

7. Nen x Impact

Metascore: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This manga-based fighting game faced harsh criticism from both reviewers and the dedicated community. Complaints centered on a thin roster of characters and a minimal offering of gameplay modes. Fan reaction was notably negative, with some expressing a hope that the title's failure would serve as a lesson for the developers.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Metascore: 51, User Score: 5.3

A part of the quirky Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this bike-riding title tasks players with gathering cute monsters. Reviewers felt that its goal to channel a unique feel didn't land, coming across as more of a cash grab than a meaningful addition to the franchise. Its 3-hour duration combined with a full retail cost seemed like a bold choice.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, Audience Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the mid-2000s, finally released after years and years in production delays. The team behind it made the decision to preserve the game as an period-accurate product of its time, fully aware that modern gamers might not appreciate its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews noted that the interesting history of its development was more compelling than the actual gameplay.

4. Scar-Lead Salvation

Aggregate Score: 44, User Score: 2.4

This anime-styled action game inspired by games like *Returnal* fell flat with critics. The main issues centered on uninspired foes, samey environments, and a forgettable story. A controversial mechanic involving the protagonist's clothing was widely panned and took away from the game's enjoyment.

3. Ambulance Life

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Think of the tense surgery games of the past, then strip away the memorable characters. That, according to reviews, is roughly *Ambulance Life*. Reviewers found the ambulance-driving sequences to be tedious and repetitive, and the story's portrayal of serious themes was criticized as being poorly executed. The overall experience was deemed not very compelling.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, User Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic digital companion formula transforms the franchise into a shopping simulation title. The result, based on critics, was a unsatisfying assortment of simple minigames that quickly overstayed its welcome. Some reviews went so far as to declare it one of the worst titles available on its platform, noting a dearth of depth.

1. MindsEye

Aggregate Score: 37, User Score: 2.5

Intended to be a high-profile open-world action game from a studio led by experienced developers, *MindsEye* was a catastrophic disappointment. Reviews savaged its weak action, boring plot, and a host of technical problems. Many found it to be a regression compared to decades-old games in the same genre. Despite the scathing reviews, a few of positive user reviews found value in the experience, offering a lonely counterpoint.

The writer

Morgan Lindsey

Professional poker player and analyst with over a decade of experience in high-stakes tournaments and strategy coaching.

Supreme Poker World

Type to search articles.